Country guide

Pay transparency in Finland

What the EU Pay Transparency Directive means for employers in Finland, based on its national transposition — status, thresholds, the joint-assessment trigger, and where to file.

By Paritir · Last updated 28 September 2026

Draft / in progress

Finland has missed the deadline. A transposition draft was published 16 May 2025; the draft government bill went out to consultation from 22 December 2025 to 9 February 2026 (75 responses), and the bill — HE 129/2026 vp — was given to the Eduskunta on 9 July 2026, a month after the 7 June 2026 transposition deadline the bill itself names. Its status is Vireillä (pending): Parliament has not passed it. Entry into force on 1 January 2027 is the Government's stated INTENTION, tied to the 2027 budget bill — the operative commencement clause of every one of the five bills still carries the unfilled placeholder "Tämä laki tulee voimaan päivänä kuuta 20.", so no date is enacted. The bill would set a reporting duty at 100+ (§ 6 d), a joint pay assessment at 100+ on a 5% gap (§ 6 e), pay-criteria transparency for all employers and pay-progression criteria at 50+, and a laiminlyöntimaksu of 5,000–80,000 € for failing to supply the data (§ 21 b) — all provisional until passage. Existing palkkakartoitus duties under the Tasa-arvolaki remain in force and are NOT superseded: the bill's enacting formula does not touch §§ 6 a or 6 b.

Finland has a transposition bill in progress but has not yet enacted it. The figures below reflect the directive's defaults and the draft as it stands, and may change before the law is final.

Finland sets reporting duties by employer size; the table below lists each band as the law states it. The directive's 5% trigger for a joint pay assessment applies until national law sets its own.

We have not yet confirmed from the national text whether the pay-gap figures must be published. Either way, the underlying work is the same: establish work of equal value through gender-neutral job evaluation, produce the statutory pay-gap report in the national format, and run a joint assessment where the gap is too wide.

Obligations at a glance

Reporting threshold
EmployeesFromCadenceStatusSource
30 or more employees 2005 Every two years Confirmed Enacted · read 3 September 2026 · matches the text we hold
150 to 249 employees 2028 Every three years Anticipated Draft · read 3 September 2026
250 or more employees 2028 Annual Anticipated Draft · read 3 September 2026
100 to 149 employees 2031 Every three years Anticipated Draft · read 3 September 2026
Laws in force
Joint pay assessmentThe directive's 5% trigger for a joint pay assessment applies until national law sets its own.
Public publicationNot yet confirmed
Competent authority Tasa-arvovaltuutettu (Ombudsman for Equality)

How this data is sourced →

Frequently asked

Is the EU Pay Transparency Directive in force in Finland?

Finland has a transposition bill in progress but has not yet enacted it. The figures below reflect the directive's defaults and the draft as it stands, and may change before the law is final.

Which employers have to report in Finland?

Finland sets reporting duties by employer size; the table below lists each band as the law states it. 30 or more employees, from 2005, every two years.

What triggers a joint pay assessment in Finland?

The directive's 5% trigger for a joint pay assessment applies until national law sets its own.

This guide summarises publicly available information for orientation only. It is not legal advice — confirm every figure against the national transposition text (Finland) before relying on it.

Become a design partner Compare all 29 countries